Study

Efficacy of orally administered ivermectin on lungworm infection in free-ranging bighorn sheep

  • Published source details Easterly T.G., Jenkins K.J. & McCabe T.R. (1992) Efficacy of orally administered ivermectin on lungworm infection in free-ranging bighorn sheep. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 34-39

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use drugs to treat parasites

Action Link
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
  1. Use drugs to treat parasites

    A replicated, controlled, before-and-after study in 1987–1988 in a state park in South Dakota, USA (Easterly et al. 1992) found that following medical treatment, lungworm larvae levels in bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis faeces reduced over the following month, but not 3–7 months after treatment. In the month following treatment, average concentrations of lungworm larvae in faeces of bighorn sheep treated with one dose (50–250 larvae/g faeces) or two doses of ivermectin (50–300 larvae/g faeces) were lower than in untreated sheep (500–1,400 larvae/g faeces). However, by 3–7 months after treatments, average concentrations of lungworm larvae did not differ significantly between treated (600–1,300 larvae/g faeces) and untreated sheep (300-600 larvae/g faeces). One group of free-ranging female sheep received alfalfa treated with the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin in February 1987 and 1988 (four and six individuals, respectively) and another group received it in both February and March 1987 and January and February 1988 (seven and 14 sheep respectively). Five (1987) and nine (1988) sheep were untreated. Each treatment was administrated over two successive days at a rate of 2 ml ivermectin/sheep, and sheep were pre-baited with untreated alfalfa two weeks prior to each treatment. Parasite counts were made through analysing sheep faeces collected weekly from January to March and June to August in 1987-1988.

    (Summarised by: Ricardo Rocha)

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust