Study

Effects of adding sounds to cod traps on the probability of collisions by humpback whales

  • Published source details Lien J., Barney W., Todd S., Seton R. & Guzzwell J. (1992) Effects of adding sounds to cod traps on the probability of collisions by humpback whales. Pages 701-708 in: A.J. Thomas, R.A. Kastelein & A.Y. Supin (eds.) Marine Mammal Sensory Systems. Plenum Press, New York.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use acoustic devices on fishing gear

Action Link
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
  1. Use acoustic devices on fishing gear

    A controlled, before-and-after study (year not stated) in eight pelagic areas in the North Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Canada (Lien et al. 1992) found that cod Gadus morhua traps with acoustic devices attached had fewer humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae collisions than traps without acoustic devices. The average number of humpback whale collisions was lower at traps after acoustic devices were installed (0.02 collisions/day) compared to before (0.4 collisions/day) or at control traps without acoustic devices (0.04 collisions/day). Average fish catches (including target species) were greater in traps with acoustic devices (686 kg/day) than those without (30–235 kg/day). In spring and summer, fishers deployed cod traps for 169 days before and 1,762 days after acoustic devices were installed. Control traps without acoustic devices were deployed for 2,223 days. Six or seven acoustic devices were attached to each trap (one at each corner, 2–3 on the leader section), 2 m below the water surface. Devices emitted sound pulses centred at 4 kHz every 3–6 seconds. Fishers recorded whale collisions and fish catches for each trap deployment.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust