Study

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Revert arable land to permanent grassland

Action Link
Bird Conservation

Reduce pesticide or herbicide use generally

Action Link
Bird Conservation

Convert or revert arable land to permanent grassland

Action Link
Farmland Conservation

Reduce fertilizer, pesticide or herbicide use generally

Action Link
Farmland Conservation
  1. Revert arable land to permanent grassland

    A controlled before-and-after study in 1970-94 in a 28 km2 area of arable farmland in Sussex, England (Aebischer & Potts 1998), found that grey partridge Perdix perdix numbers declined rapidly on arable fields in 1987-94, following their reversion to grassland, beginning in 1987 (average of 6.5 coveys/km2 in 1970-86 vs. 1.1 coveys/km2 in 1987-94). There was a considerably smaller decline on arable fields that were not reverted to grassland (average of 4.9 coveys/km2 in 1970-86 vs. 2.5 coveys/km2 in 1987-94). The reversed fields went from being more favoured by partridges before reversion to less favoured afterwards, equating to a 23% per year decrease in relative habitat quality on the reversion fields.

     

  2. Reduce pesticide or herbicide use generally

    A controlled before-and-after study in 1989-94 in a 28 km2 area of arable farmland in Sussex, England (Aebischer & Potts 1998), found significantly higher survival rates of grey partridge Perdix perdix chicks on 21 km2 with irregular insecticide applications, compared to a 7 km2 farm with insecticide applications four times a year (average of 34% survival on low application farms vs. 22% on high application farm). Before the start of intensive insecticide application (1970-88), there was no difference between areas (27% survival on low application farms vs. 30% on intensive application farm).

     

  3. Convert or revert arable land to permanent grassland

    A controlled before-and-after study from 1970 to 1994 in Sussex, England (Aebischer & Potts 1998), found that grey partridge Perdix perdix numbers declined rapidly on arable fields following their reversion to grassland, which began in 1987 (average 6.5 coveys (flocks)/km2 in 1970-1986 vs 1.1 coveys/km2 in 1987-1994). There was a considerably smaller decline on arable fields that were not reverted to grassland (average 4.9 coveys/km2 in 1970-86 vs 2.5 coveys/km2 in 1987-1994). Fields that were reverted had been favoured by partridges prior to reversion, in comparison to arable fields, but were less favoured after reversion, equating to a 23% per year decrease in relative habitat quality. Fields in a 28 km2 area were surveyed for grey partridges in late August/early September after the autumn harvest by driving across fields at dawn and dusk and mapping the position of each observation.

     

  4. Reduce fertilizer, pesticide or herbicide use generally

    A site comparison before-and-after study from 1989 to 1994 in Sussex, England (Aebischer & Potts 1998) found that survival rates of grey partridge Perdix perdix chicks were significantly higher on 21 km2 of arable farmland that received irregular insecticide applications, compared to a 7 km2 farm with insecticide applications four times a year (average 34% survival on low application farms vs 22% on high application farm). Before the start of intensive insecticide application (1970-1988), survival on the farm had been similar to, or higher than, that on the surrounding farms (27% survival on low application farms vs 30% on intensive application farm). Chick survival rates (up to the age of approximately six weeks) were calculated each year and compared between areas with intensive and irregular insecticide applications. A long-term data set (1970-1988) collected prior to this study was used to investigate chick survival prior to insecticide application on the intensive application farm.

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust