Study

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Apply herbicide and sow seeds of shrubland plants to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation

Cut/mow to control grass and sow seed of shrubland plants

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation
  1. Apply herbicide and sow seeds of shrubland plants to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled study in 2005–2006 in sagebrush scrub habitat, dominated by non-native grasses in the USA (Marushia & Allen 2011) found that sowing seeds, followed by spraying with herbicide did not reduce the cover of non-native species nor did it increase the cover of native species, but it did increase the number of native plant species. In areas that were seeded and sprayed with herbicide, cover of non-native plant species (40%) was not significantly different from areas that had been seeded but not sprayed with herbicide (63%). Native species cover was also not significantly different in areas that had been seeded and sprayed with herbicide (40%) compared to areas that had been seeded but not sprayed (cover 24%). However, areas that were seeded and sprayed with herbicide had a higher number of native plant species (7 species) than areas that were seeded but not sprayed (5 species). In 2005 five 5 m2 plots were sown with seeds of shrubland species and sprayed with herbicide, while five other plots were sown with seeds but not sprayed with herbicide. Plant cover was measured in a 0.5 m2 quadrat placed in each plot.

  2. Cut/mow to control grass and sow seed of shrubland plants

    A randomized, replicated, controlled study in 2005–2006 in sagebrush scrub habitat, dominated by exotic grass species in California, USA (Marushia & Allen 2011) found that sowing seeds of native species, followed by mowing, did not reduce the cover of non-native species nor did it increase the cover or number of native plant species. In areas that were seeded and mown cover of non-native plant species (43%) was not significantly different from areas that had been seeded but not mown (63%). Cover and number of native plant species were also not significantly different in areas that had been seeded and mown (cover: 18%; number of species: 5) compared to areas that had been seeded but not mown (cover: 24%; number of species: 4). In 2005 five 5 m2 plots were sown with seeds of shrubland species and mown, while five other plots were sown with seeds but not mown. Plant cover was measured in 0.5 m2 quadrats placed in each plot.

Output references
What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation assesses the research looking at whether interventions are beneficial or not. It is based on summarised evidence in synopses, on topics such as amphibians, bats, biodiversity in European farmland, and control of freshwater invasive species. More are available and in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
Our Journal: Conservation Evidence

Our Journal:
Conservation Evidence

A unique, free to publish open-access journal publishing research and case studies that measure the effects of conservation actions.

Read latest volume: Volume 16

Special issues: Amphibian special issue

Go to the Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust