Study

Demographic and Female Life History Parameters of Free-Ranging Chimpanzees at the Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Project, River Gambia National Park

  • Published source details Brewer M.S., Marsden D. & Emery T.M. (2006) Demographic and Female Life History Parameters of Free-Ranging Chimpanzees at the Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Project, River Gambia National Park. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 391-410

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Remove/treat external/internal parasites to increase reproductive success/survival

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Reintroduce primates into habitat where the species is absent

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Reintroduce primates into habitat with predators

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Rehabilitate injured/orphaned primates

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Regularly and continuously provide supplementary food to primates

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Treat sick/injured animals

Action Link
Primate Conservation

Reintroduce primates in groups

Action Link
Primate Conservation
  1. Remove/treat external/internal parasites to increase reproductive success/survival

    A study in 1979-2004 in tropical forest on Baboon Islands, River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that rehabilitated and reintroduced western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that received periodic deworming alongside other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to that in wild chimpanzees, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower than in wild populations. Inter-birth interval, average age at first birth, proportion males at birth, age at first sexual swelling in females, and adolescent infertility were similar to that of wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees from various backgrounds were released in groups on three islandsinto habitat with natural predators (although these were rare), but with no wild or previously reintroduced chimpanzees. Chimpanzees were given antibiotic treatment when they suffered from severe colds, and were provided supplementary food every 1-2 days. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  2. Reintroduce primates into habitat where the species is absent

    A study in 1979–2004 in tropical forest in The Gambia, found that the population of rehabilitated western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were reintroduced into habitat with no wild or previously reintroduced chimpanzees, along with other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to wild chimpanzees, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower than in wild populations. Time between births, average age at first birth, proportion of males at birth, age at first sexual swelling in females, and adolescent infertility were similar to that of wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees from various backgrounds were released on three islands. Individuals were reintroduced in groups and into habitat with small populations of natural predators. They were provided supplementary food daily or on every second day, depending on which one of the islands they lived on. Individuals were periodically dewormed, and given antibiotic treatment when they suffered from severe colds. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  3. Reintroduce primates into habitat with predators

    A study in 1979–2004 in tropical forest in River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that rehabilitated western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were reintroduced into habitat with small populations of natural predators, alongside other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to wild chimpanzee populations, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower. Time between births, average age at first birth, proportion of males at birth, age at first sexual swelling in females, and adolescent infertility, were similar to wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees were released on three islands. Individuals were reintroduced in groups and into habitat with no wild or previously reintroduced chimpanzees. Chimpanzees were provided supplementary food daily or every second day, depending on which one of the islands they lived on. Individuals received periodic deworming, and were given antibiotic treatment when they suffered from severe colds. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  4. Rehabilitate injured/orphaned primates

    A study in 1979-2004 in tropical forest on Baboon Islands, River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that reintroduced western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were rehabilitated before releases along with other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to that of wild chimpanzees. However, infant mortality (18%) was lower than in wild populations. Other reproductive parameters were similar to those of wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees with various backgrounds and exposure to human care and handling were released on three islands. Nine of these had been received from traders, nursed back to health, and regularly taken into the forest for five years before being moved to Niokolo Koba National Park in Senegal, where they stayed for five years before being released to River Gambia National Park. Individuals were reintroduced in groups and into habitat with no chimpanzees but with predators (although these were rare) . They were provided with supplementary food daily or every second day. Individuals received periodic deworming, and were given antibiotic for severe colds. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  5. Regularly and continuously provide supplementary food to primates

    A study in 1979-2004 in tropical forest on Baboon Islands, River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that rehabilitated and reintroduced western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were regularly and continuously provided with supplementary food along with other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to wild chimpanzees, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower than in wild populations. Inter-birth interval, average age at first birth, proportion males at birth and other reproductive parameters were similar to those of wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees from various backgrounds were released on three islands. Individuals were reintroduced in groups and into habitat with natural predators (although these were rare), but with no chimpanzees. Individuals received periodic deworming, and were given antibiotics for severe colds. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  6. Treat sick/injured animals

    A study in 1979-2004 in tropical forest on Baboon Islands, River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that rehabilitated and reintroduced western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were treated when sick alongside other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this population increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to that in wild chimpanzees, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower than in wild populations. Inter-birth interval, average age at first birth, proportion males at birth, age at first sexual swelling in females, and adolescent infertility were all similar to that of wild chimpanzees. Individuals received periodic deworming and antibiotic treatment for severe colds. Chimpanzees were reintroduced in groups and into habitat with natural predators (although these were rare), but with no other chimpanzees. They were provided supplementary food every 1-2 days. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

  7. Reintroduce primates in groups

    A study in 1979-2004 in tropical forest on Baboon Islands, River Gambia National Park, The Gambia found that rehabilitated western chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus that were reintroduced in groups along with other interventions, increased from 50 to 69 chimpanzees over 25 years. No statistical tests were carried out to determine whether this increase was significant. Fertility and mortality rates were similar to wild chimpanzees, except for infant mortality (18%), which was lower than in wild populations. Inter-birth interval, average age at first birth, proportion males at birth, age at first sexual swelling in females, and adolescent infertility were similar to wild chimpanzees. In total, 50 chimpanzees from various backgrounds were released on three islands. Individuals were reintroduced into habitat with no wild or previously reintroduced chimpanzees and with small populations of natural predators. They were continuously provided supplementary food every 1-2 days. Individuals received periodic deworming and antibiotic treatment when they suffered severe colds. The study does not distinguish between the effects of the different interventions mentioned above.

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust