Study

Effects of over-winter feeding on local population density and reproductive physiology of willow tits Parus montanus near Gothenburg, Göteburg och Bohus, Sweden

  • Published source details Silverin B., Viebke P.A. & Westin J. (1989) An artificial simulation of the vernal increase in day length and its effects on the reproductive system in three species of tits (Parus spp.), and modifying effects of environmental factors: a field experiment. The Condor, 91, 598-608

Summary

As part of a broader investigation into the cues stimulating the onset of breeding in tits Parus spp., this study investigated the effects of over-winter supplementary feeding on the local population density and reproductive physiology of willow tits Parus montanus in an area of coniferous forest east of Gothenburg, south-western Sweden.

 

During one autumn/winter, tits within the 1.2 km² study area were fed sunflower seeds from 19 automatic feeders. In February, certain groups of willow tits were monitored to estimate winter group size within both the supplementary-fed population and a control (unfed) population in an area of coniferous forest located c.20 km away.

In mid-February and mid-March, a number of individuals from each population were captured and (following the collection of a blood sample) killed. Levels of reproductive hormones (e.g. luteinizing hormone and testosterone) in the blood plasma were measured, and the testes or ovaries of specimens were weighed.

 

Thirteen of the 19 feeders were used by mixed groups of tits Parus spp. throughout the winter. Winter group size for willow tits was 3.0 ± 0.4 (n = 9 groups) in the supplementary-fed population and 1.5 ± 0.1 (n = 10) in the control population. The density of willow tit groups within the supplementary feeding area (c.7/km²) was also higher than the average reported for the species (4.8/km²).

Levels of luteinizing hormone and testosterone increased significantly between February and March in males from the supplementary-fed population; no such changes were detected in females from either of the populations. By March, levels of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in supplementary-fed males were significantly higher than in control males. Although the gonads of both sexes were initially (in February) significantly heavier in supplementary-fed birds, by mid-March they had reached a similar size in both populations.
Thus, although supplementary feeding apparently resulted in larger winter group size (and higher local population density), the authors suggest that this may have increased male–male competition during the establishment of breeding territories.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, which can be accessed from http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/index.php

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust